AMP Reviews
  • You asked and we delivered! AMPReviews now provides the option to upgrade to VIP access via paid subscription as an alternative to writing your own reviews. VIP Access allows you to read all the hidden content within member-submitted reviews AND gives access to private VIP-only forums in each city. You can upgrade your account INSTANTLY by visiting the Account Upgrades page in your own user profile and using a valid credit card to purchase a subscription. You can get to this page by clicking the link in any review, by clicking the red "See the Details Now" banner on the home page, and by clicking the Purchase Private Details link in the navbar at the top of every page

AMP Websites | Now & Before

D

Duhless

Registered Member
Messages: 2
Reviews: 1
Joined
Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I think that the AMP websites from c. 2015-2018 did a much better job at showcasing the girls than the AMP sites nowadays.

When I compare the old sites of Private Hottie, KissKissPop, Honey Girl Spa, etc. to the sites now, i.e., Shangri-La, Bubble Girls, etc., it's night and day with regards to the transparency / authenticity of the girls, and the overall booking experience. The websites in 2015-2018 had stunning photography, which elevated the whole experience. There was a thread posted today notifying members that Joey and Cherry from PH are back in action, and some old photos were posted in that thread (including Lucia from PH) and it really hit this point home for me. Those photos showcase the girls so well, and those images are burned into my brain. I can't say the same about photos from websites currently on the market.

Could just be nostalgia, but I feel like the style / manner of photography that is prevalent now pales in comparison, and I wish they would get back the old photographer / web designer from those old sites, and actually showcase the working girls like in the past. Oh, and while they're at it, getting the girls back from Sally's Spa et. al would be nice too. Heigh-ho!
 
I do believe 90-95% of pics they post are fake. I even shocked when I found some places pretty well reviewed on this board use fake photographs.
 
Duhless said:
Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I think that the AMP websites from c. 2015-2018 did a much better job at showcasing the girls than the AMP sites nowadays.

When I compare the old sites of Private Hottie, KissKissPop, Honey Girl Spa, etc. to the sites now, i.e., Shangri-La, Bubble Girls, etc., it's night and day with regards to the transparency / authenticity of the girls, and the overall booking experience. The websites in 2015-2018 had stunning photography, which elevated the whole experience. There was a thread posted today notifying members that Joey and Cherry from PH are back in action, and some old photos were posted in that thread (including Lucia from PH) and it really hit this point home for me. Those photos showcase the girls so well, and those images are burned into my brain. I can't say the same about photos from websites currently on the market.

Could just be nostalgia, but I feel like the style / manner of photography that is prevalent now pales in comparison, and I wish they would get back the old photographer / web designer from those old sites, and actually showcase the working girls like in the past. Oh, and while they're at it, getting the girls back from Sally's Spa et. al would be nice too. Heigh-ho!
Click to expand...
More real photos then. Younger girls now. I'll take the trade off most days.
 
I think KG's photos are directionally accurate in most cases, but I agree with OP about some of the sites some years ago doing a better job of showcasing with accuracy. Especially a LONG time ago with places like the original Rainbow on 38th, Asiangoldenflowers, and their peers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top